Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Civil Rights Movement in the United States: The Effects of the Civil Rights Movement on Race Relations within the United States

The Jim Crow System is a system in and through which the central thinking is divergentiation. This differentiation is done on the hind end of ethnicity or race. Differentiation entails the recognition that races argon different and as much(prenominal)(prenominal), it creates a governmental setting that separates races such as the uncontaminatings from the Blacks. In extension to this, it also separates and ultimately, limits or confines races such as the Blacks to a kind firmament with corresponding affectionate functions that are obligate on them.The urbane Rights Movement whitethorn be seen as a outcome of such a differentiation and segregation within the kind sphere that it reflects the recognition of the unjust and inhumane aspect of such methods of social differentiation and social segregation. After the state movement, it has been argued that racial differentiation and segregation no yearner exists within the United States, and collect to this in a sense impr ession the cultured Rights Movement has been successful. However, there are several contentions to such a perspective.First, the effects of the expedited carrying into swear out of civil rights on all facets and areas of familiarity, especially in the North, combined with the break short from the traditional means of social integration helped visible light the violent white backlash of the 1970s. The White wince is a reactionary populism involving the kernel, working chassis travel by a sense of holy terror regarding the policies enforced during the cartridge holder. Thus, race and racism are not to be seen as the main situationors involved for they cannot account for the White kick back in a manner that is all accept satisfactory.It is of equal importance that we take into consideration the fact that the Whites resi place to the policies implemented during the time was also brought about by a global feeling of threat and the idea of being displaced in their communit ies. The discussions regarding racial segregation in give lessonss and communities and forced busing upgrade strengthens this point. Anformer(a) issue of vital importance that may be related to the idea of gentrification. This refers to the Whites reactionary stance on the implemented policies generated feelings of threat regarding both(prenominal) their sense of security and sense of community.It is great to note that the truly idea and experience of homelessness, being evicted from ones immediate environment and his or her social and political milieu is degrading for the evicted families and individuals. The aforementioned(prenominal) experience generates feelings of powerlessness, anxiety, and oppression. In American history, gentrification is considered as a mechanism for the revival meeting or rehabilitation of the casualties brought about by wars and conflicts both from external and internal threats.Examples of such destructive courses in history are World War I and Worl d War II. Gentrification, as viewed by Smith, results in the displacement of lower income people such as laborers by the well-to-do or the middle class in the process of rehabilitating, revitalizing, and upgrading of deteriorated urban property. In so far as gentrification obliterates working class communities, displaces unfortunate households and converts whole neighborhoods into bourgeois enclaves, the frontier ideology rationalizes social differentiation and exclusion as natural and undeniable (Smith, 1992, p. 2). These ideas strengthen the general view that the White squinch is largely the reaction of the social classes in the middle and lowest strata, the working class White Bostonians since the elites are in his words exempted from the start. The feeling of threat and the fear of displacement in their communities, these are important factors to consider as to why the White Backlash occurred. The fuss with the frontier ideology and the process of gentrification, as I reckon , is that they pose serious threats on the genuinely notion of a shared out history.As the materially-driven real estate industries and markets continue to flourish and the coming of deindustrialization, the easier it displaces low-income people from their immediate social environment, social and political milieu thus, endangering the very notion of a shared history. In contrast to such claims Weisbrot (1990) claims that although certain forms of injustice still exists what is important to consider are the facets of social change resulting from the aforementioned movement.He claims, Like other reform movements the crusade for racial justice inescapably fell short of the utopian goals that sustained it. Still, if (it) is judged by the distance it traveleda record of important achievement unfolds (1990, p. 339). Such achievement involve school desegregation and the securing of representation and voting rights. In addition to this, Weisbrot argued that such developments may be se en as the result of the development of tolerance and hence pluralism within the American community.He claims that as a result of the aforementioned movement, pluralism is to a greater extent firmly rooted in American values than ever before (1990, p. 342). However, the warm-paced execution that is, of the recognition of civil rights be regarded as extreme rights that ought to be granted to every citizen of the state and not only to a selected few, the Whites unraveled structures and ideologies of society too fast most importantly the historically embedded ideas of race and class without providing or setting up new structures for what was unraveled.This presents the second limited review to the assumed success of the Civil Rights Movement. Third, educational par and racial equality were never achieved in the expedited implementation of the civil rights through desegregation, forced busing and affirmative action policies. The federal government was forcing busing, sparings, and housing all at the same time. This leads to Wickers point that the hassle with the integration plan was how extensive it was and how difficult it was to implement. This is simply because of the aforementioned reasons, which serve as warrants to my second argument.The interrogative mood regarding the expedited implementation of such policies fails to consider that such bow changes will result to devastating consequences. The problem is, so to speak, much more complex. As Wicker suggests, economic as well as political potency if African-American disadvantagesare to be overcome (1996, p. 347). The problem with the Civil Rights Movement is that it was not ecumenical. It was not universal in the sense that the Blacks themselves are not matching in their struggles for racial justice and liberation.It was not able to gain an inter-subjective consensus not only from human rights advocates entirely also most especially from the Blacks themselves. The movement lacks what may be called a unity of purpose which entails interrelated and collective actions. This is in accordance with Wickers argument regarding the failure of the aforementioned movement. Wicker (1996) contends that the Civil Rights Movement failed to enable racial integration due to the continuing separation of whites and blacks into hostile and unequal classes which leads to political deadlock, economic inequity, and social rancor that mark American life (p. 345).In summary, although the implementation of civil rights on all facets and areas of society created changes on the realms of the social, political, and economic but there remains a question whether such huge and base changes are effective since the phenomenon in itself is deeply embedded in the culture of the American society. True, the American society and its political culture do have problems. In the case of racial and educational equality and the expedited implementation of the civil rights, however, the issues are more intricate. In o rder for racial inequalities to end, American society must be prepared for huge and radical changes

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.